MOoOADTAOCNIT OF THE NAVY
PEs. MEN S Set Oe Pe Sees &
ROARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
©
mS
—
t =
ti
k
vr
t
HR
orrection or your
1
10 of the United
rR
JH-
cr @
!
o
ms
£
oe
ct
ma i
1
wu
Or
6
%
ct
JW
wn
Qo
oa
a0
M
Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the
Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of
limitations and consider your application on its merits A
three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on .
18 November 2014. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request Your allegations of error
and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to tne proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consi
your application, together with all material submitted in
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulati
and policies
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence sul tted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable erial error or
Ln uselce
l
You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty on 28 June 1968. On 16 June'1969, a medical board diagnosed
‘you with a passive aggressive personality disorder that existed
rior to your enlistment. Subsequently, you were notified of
pending administrative separation action by reason o£
unsuitability due to the diagnosed disorder You were afforded
all of your procedural rights including the opportunity to submit
a statement on your behalf Your case was forwarded and the
discharge authority directed that you received a general
jischarge by reason of unsuitability You were so discharged on
ee J
On 17 August 1977, the Naval Discharge Review Boara
\ df
a Special Discharge Review Program, upgraded your discharge to
honorable.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your record of service and assertion that in the absence of a
Dimemannd wast Beatie aes A eee AtdtnAAnwsrAn~+ foman\ wR RARMaAYMeTtE IAS
MLayilvoee bhYeSY ee ee wmwetwenw wae I He ye aur s x eed te ee ee
code is nonexistent and erroneous. Nevertheless, based on the
information currently contained in your record, the Board
concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change
to your separation code given the reason for your discharge. In
this regard, your separation code means you met the criteria
needed under a Special Discharge Review Program as outlined under
the authority of title 10 U.S.C. Section 1553. In this regard,
you were assigned the most appropriated separation code based on
your circumstances. Regarding your assertion of suffering from
in-service PTSD, there is no evidence in the record to support
it, and you submitted no such evidence. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
ely
i
Since
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Fxecutive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10558-09
On 9 September ove administrative separation action was initiated by reason 0 am 7 a eine ; 74° a Vado 4 os misconduct for drug abuse You waived your rights to consult iL SCor#n C £ rug DUSe . The Board noted that you waived your rights to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a more favorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3458 14
The discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, on 17 October 1986, you were so discharged The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your discharge and assertion of suffering with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) which existed prior to service. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8553 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7018S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5865 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, applicable statutes, regulations, You enlisted in the Marine Corps iod of active duty on 28 April 1969. Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now. New evidence is evidence not previously considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3010 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12921 14
FO. Finally, the medical documentation you provided does not negate the diagnoses of your depressive disorder, history of drug abuse, or ADHD. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR067 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2014 The names and votes of tne members of the panel will be furnished upon request your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together wit! Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10805 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...